Flagship Initiative In Development

The Cost of Inaction: Obesity in Arizona

A comprehensive policy paper on the economic and clinical case for evidence-based obesity care coverage in Arizona's Medicaid program.

AOO's flagship advocacy work — built to give Arizona legislators, payers, employers, and Medicaid officials the evidence base they need to act on obesity coverage.

Status
In development
Target release
2026
Sections
6
Lead author
AOO
White Paper · 2026

The Cost of Inaction: Obesity in Arizona

Arizona Obesity Organization · A 501(c)(3) nonprofit policy initiative
  • I. Epidemiology & Disease Burden
  • II. Economic Impact & Cost of Inaction
  • III. Clinical Outcomes of Treatment
  • IV. Policy & Coverage Landscape
  • V. Pathways Forward for Arizona
  • VI. Appendix & Methodology
IN
DEVELOPMENT
Current status

This paper is still being written.

The Cost of Inaction is currently in development. We expect to release the full paper in 2026. Sign up below to be notified at release — and to receive the executive summary first.

What this paper is

The case Arizona needs to hear.

"Arizona's failure to cover evidence-based obesity treatment is not a budget decision — it is a transfer of cost from prevention to chronic disease management, paid in both dollars and years of life."

The Cost of Inaction is a comprehensive policy paper making the economic, clinical, and human case for evidence-based obesity care coverage in Arizona — across Medicaid, commercial plans, and employer benefits.

It is written for an Arizona audience: legislators deciding how to allocate state health spending, AHCCCS officials writing coverage policy, payer medical directors setting formulary decisions, employer benefits leaders evaluating their plans, and healthcare executives setting strategic direction for obesity care.

Each section translates the underlying clinical and economic evidence into the form decision-makers can actually use: cost projections, coverage comparisons across states, treatment-outcome data, and a concrete set of pathways forward for Arizona.

What's inside

Six sections, one argument.

Each section is built to stand on its own — readable in 10-15 minutes — while contributing to the full economic, clinical, and policy case for action.

I.

Epidemiology & Disease Burden

How many Arizonans live with obesity and preobesity today, where the disease concentrates geographically and demographically, and how the burden has shifted over the last decade.

II.

Economic Impact & Cost of Inaction

The annual economic cost of untreated obesity in Arizona — to Medicaid, employers, and the broader health system — and the projected savings from expanded coverage of evidence-based treatments.

III.

Clinical Outcomes of Treatment

What the evidence shows about treatment effectiveness — pharmacotherapy, bariatric surgery, lifestyle interventions — and the specific health outcomes that improve with access to care.

IV.

Policy & Coverage Landscape

The current state of obesity treatment coverage in Arizona — AHCCCS Medicaid policy, commercial plan formularies, employer benefit trends — and how Arizona compares to other states.

V.

Pathways Forward for Arizona

Concrete policy and benefits-design recommendations — for legislators, AHCCCS officials, payers, and employers — with implementation steps and projected impact.

VI.

Appendix & Methodology

Full citation list, source library structure, economic modeling assumptions, and methodology notes — supporting the rigor and reproducibility of every claim in the paper.

Methodology

Built on the evidence — every claim cited.

The Cost of Inaction is structured to withstand scrutiny from clinicians, economists, payer actuaries, and policy analysts alike.

90+
peer-reviewed sources in the working source library
  • i.

    Topic-organized source library

    Every source is categorized by topic and section it supports. Reviewers can trace claims from headline to citation in a single click.

  • ii.

    Multi-source verification

    Every major claim is supported by at least two independent peer-reviewed or authoritative sources where possible.

  • iii.

    Transparent economic assumptions

    Cost projections include sensitivity analysis. Modeling assumptions are documented in Section VI for independent verification.

  • iv.

    Arizona-specific framing

    National data is contextualized to Arizona — using AZ DOH, AHCCCS, and state-level surveillance data where available.

  • v.

    Authorship by AOO clinical & policy team

    Drafted by AOO board members with clinical, policy, and public health expertise. Funder-independent (see below).

Disclosures & funding

Funding, conflicts of interest, and editorial independence.

AOO believes credible advocacy requires transparent disclosure. The full disclosure language below is the same statement that will appear in the published manuscript and the 2-page legislator brief — published here so visitors, funders, and journalists can review it before the paper is released.

★ Sponsored research grants

Funders

  • Novo Nordisk
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • IntraSana
Disclosure window

12 months

  • All disclosed relationships fall within the past 12 months of publication.
Author Disclosure & Funding — full statement
This paper was supported by sponsored research grants from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Company, and IntraSana. The funders had no role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or writing of this paper; the funders did not review or approve the manuscript prior to submission.

Douglas Maready, MD, has received speaker honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Company, and IntraSana within the past 12 months. Dr. Maready is the Board Chair of the Arizona Obesity Organization (AOO), a 501(c)(3) advocacy group. The views expressed are the author's own and do not represent those of any funder.

Read AOO's full Conflict of Interest Policy
Be the first to read it

Get notified when the white paper releases.

Sign up below to receive the executive summary as soon as it's ready, and to be among the first to access the full paper at release.